Now, I am trudging through windows XP with a measly 256mbs of RAM and ready to hang myself it's so slow. I assume it's a mobo problem, as I got this PC used, but sadly, the stupid BIOS for this computer doesn't allow me to do things like adjust RAM voltage, etc. And depending on its clock speed and latencies, it may require you. You likely can and the 8GB stick to it, but that additional 8GB will run in single channel. The 4 memory sticks are all the same exact 256mbs and all made by the same company. You need 1 in each channel, and most motherboards dont like a slots 2+3 config and generally recommend using slots 1+3 or 2+4. The odd thing is, if I connect the 3 sticks into the slots after I boot up my PC (being grounded of course), both CPU-Z and SpeedFan (programs that can detect hardware) BOTH detect the 3 sticks, but alas, they go unused. I have tried swapping the memory sticks with new ones that I'm sure work, as well as replacing the power source of my PC with a newer one that I know works, and cleaned the memory slots as best I could with compressed air, etc, and no dice: they still fail. Then, a week ago, slots 1 and 2 also went dead. So I trial and errored until I pinpointed it to the 3rd slot malfunctioning. As this third stick works as a single-channel then of course it provides less efficiency than the previous 2 sticks of RAM and thus gives a slight performance increase to your PC. Greetings I have this old HP Compaq d530 Small Form Factor PC that I got used about a year ago, and 6 months ago it's 3rd DIMM (RAM) slot stopped working, as in gave me 5 beeps on startup, which is this models beep code for a RAM issue. Here are the major points of differences between 4 sticks and 2 sticks of RAM. You can now imagine the performance increase if you add a third stick in a motherboard with 4 slots.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |